One of our lurkers, <@UMH5FAW2Y>, whipped up this ...
# thinking-together
i
One of our lurkers, @Alex Wein, whipped up this beautiful interactive display based on the community survey. I think you'll enjoy playing with this. https://observablehq.com/@a-lexwein/what-future-of-coding-topics-interest-you-most
😍 10
🀯 1
r
It's interesting to me that Tools for Thought / Mind Bicycles is the most popular, because that's one of the least specific to programming. What does everyone make of that?
i
I think a lot of the people here are fond of the Doug Engelbart line of thinking: computers are tools for augmenting human intellect, for which programming is just a means to an end. How we all arrived at that thinking, I don't know. I arrived there via Bret Victor.
(small n, I know, but there might be something to this)
s
Its also crazy how many lurkers we have, most people that responded to the survey are lurkers!
i
I don't think that's the case..
(see the pie chart)
The survey showed that there are more non-lurkers than lurkers... but the Slack stats..
Show that, you are correct, we have a lot of lurkers.
In the podcast, I theorized β€”Β the people who have the time and interest to post are probably also more likely to have the time and interest to fill out a survey.
e
is there data about current tools and languages people in here are using?
ah I think it wasn't part of the survey
maybe for the next one πŸ™‚
i
That's an interesting thought. Something like, "What programming language(s) are you using to build your FoC project(s)?"
πŸ‘ 2
r
Love the programming language question. It would also be cool to do a question about tools for thought in general, but I'm struggling to figure out how to ask it in a useful manner. Maybe someone else can figure out a good way. Here's how I would phrase the problem: When you say "Tools for thought", I personally don't even quite know what that means. E.g., if you were to write a (SEO-title ready) blog post, here are the top ten tools for thought, what would be on that list?
w
hah, love that the intersection of {PL theory, compilers} x {bret victor} seems to be the smallest
πŸ‘ 1