A few additional scattered thoughts / details. I'm a bit at a loss for how to talk about this — Steve is very good at smiling for the camera (so to speak) while being
very candid with his thoughts in private, so forgive me if some of this lacks diplomacy.
Several times throughout the year, Steve reached out to me with the same thoughts and feelings he shared today in that thread and in his goodbye post above — (paraphrasing and filtering out heaps of negativity), "I am disappointed with the discussions here in this community. Nobody here has vision, and nobody is willing to criticize my work. I have invested a lot of my time and have not received enough value in return. I think I'm going to leave."
Each time, I tried to talk to him about why he felt this way, offer him some of the very direct feedback he asked for (doing my best to focus on the work, keep it actionable, do
critique rather than mere
criticism). He seemed to appreciate it, and respond well to the energy of it. But none of the substance of my comments ever seemed to make it through — exactly like what you see in that thread from today. It wasn't what he wanted to hear, so he didn't hear it.
(As an illustrative example: early on in the thread today, he asked us to tell him if his explanation was unclear. Multiple people responded saying
this is unclear... and here's my best effort at what I think it is. He responded with frustration at the best-effort guesses, never offering any clarity. This is exactly the pattern that played out in all my discussions with him.)
Every time he reached out to me, I felt as though he was talking to me about these frustrations because he wanted me to make an appeal to him, to prove to him that this community was worth his time. All the while, he'd be quite dynamic and engaging and offer plenty of cheer in public, in contrast to his private frustrations.
I got the impression that he wanted me to run this community more like an incubator / accelerator. More activity, more ambition, less concern about hurt feelings, move fast and break things. He has other communities like that. What our community has, that his other ones probably don't, is deep technical / subject expertise. From his post above (emphasis added):
My intention to participate here was to share ideas, join in constructive criticism, and participate in debate which I was hoping would result in finding like minds that would work with our team — in short: recruiting. This may be against the policies of this community (I’m not clear on that) which I’m sorry for crossing the line if people felt I was advertising a product or exclusively looking to recruit.