Yeah! There've been a string of publications showing wildly better results than before, you're right, but I hadn't actually stopped to appreciate it.
Sadly, this might be the end of the genre of photogrammetric glitch art I love so.
😥 3
s
Scott Anderson
04/25/2020, 5:10 PM
Yeah I saw the NERF paper a while ago
Scott Anderson
04/25/2020, 5:10 PM
Very impressive results
Scott Anderson
04/25/2020, 5:12 PM
Expensive to train and evaluate, but volumetric photogrammetry that works with few samples is great
âž• 1
d
Duncan Cragg
04/26/2020, 11:53 AM
Why do they sound cautious about the 360° ones? Can't see why that's harder
a
alltom
04/28/2020, 5:25 PM
Where do they sound cautious? Are you referring to the bottom of the page in the section with the rotating pinecone?