Yes, this is an interesting development. Its main weakness so far is the scarcity of nanopublications, which is caused by the need to create them manually, a rather unpleasant for humans. There is ongoing research on using LLMs to derive nanopublications from papers, but the obvious risk there is getting them wrong.
I think the best future for nanopublications would be authors provide them along with papers. But I have no idea what would actually convince authors to do so.