So I’ve been triggered (in no bad meaning) by the ironic connotations about

growth hackers

notion in @Ivan Reese https://futureofcoding.slack.com/archives/CEXED56UR/p1632872466023400 post. I’ve (https://www.linkedin.com/in/tomascerkasas/, https://github.com/toinbis) been identifying myself professionally as a

growth hacker

for the past 10 years already. Have to say, growth hackers use ‘devs’ (shortening of ‘software developers’) word with same ironic connotations more often than not 🙂 So I have this 4-hours trainings, pretentiously named

how to tell a story via web medium

, prepared that I run for development+marketing teams being brought together in the same room. It is at the same time attempt to introduce

ubiquitous language

(in domain-driven-design (DDD) context) for daily communication in marketing+development teams cooperation. In an attempt to de-mystify some common myths of what

growth hackers(marketing communication specialists)

actually do and how

developers/admins/devopsers/u-name-it

could help them do their work better (or at least stop creating huge roadblocks, such as instroducing react&friends in acquisition funnel websites, to give an example) - I would like to propose to an online webinar for FoC community those above mentioned

how to tell a story via web medium

trainings (free of charge) . Please put ➕ if you’d be interested in joining this webinar. In case at least 4-5 people would express interest, we could start arrange’ing date&time in a thread, including any special topics you’d like to be addressed and included for me to prepare on top of current content.

That’s a generous offer! I hope some folks here take you up on that.

Tentatively interested. Currently in early stages of building a small startup, so this could be very timely (non FoC-related for now, sorry).

@Ivan Reese totally agree on the caricatures of real people non-related to bussiness being used in marketing communications is seems totally off! Also agree that the term

growth hacking

is very commonly misused. Yet it is very successfully coined term in a sense how real world activities correlate to semantic meaning of the term, I should say. Comparably, way bigger problem is with

content marketing

term. I was once strongly considering to attend a nationwide

content marketing

conference with a speech deck named ‘can you kindly explain me which marketing communications activities are considered not content marketing?’, but decided not to be a party pooper 🙂

Time zone?

I’m gmt+3, but I think we’ll try to look for something that will suit us both. I can be very flexible in terms of time zone adjustments

Quite intrigued by "JamStack is a curse word for marketers & developers"... 🤔 I'm eager to know what it's about 😄

Will elaborate on the curse for marketers during live meeting. For developers -

jamstack

is a term describing backend architecture - how should the server respond to request - by loading html from disk/cache and serving it statically VS dynamically rendering html response. But in 9/10 cases devs identify it as a ‘trendy’ way to build frontend. The ultimate problem is that there is a void in frontend architectures naming. Or - a mess in frontend architectures naming. Google https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2019/02/rendering-on-the-web defines it as a subset of this image: