This might be interesting to people here, in the s...
# thinking-together
j
This might be interesting to people here, in the sense of getting an idea of what it takes to “make big change” above and beyond mere technological proposals. Authors include Mark Guzdial & Barbara Ericson, both very well known in US CS Ed research/transformation. (I don’t necessarily personally agree that the right content / tools / mindsets are being scaled up mind you!) Fostering State-level Change In CS Education: The Expanding Computing Education Pathways Alliance https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3293812
Efforts to improve and promote CS education characterized by greater participation of underrepresented groups have taken off sharply in the six years since the Expanding Computing Education Pathways (ECEP) NSF alliance was first funded. Though many of these initiatives are occurring at the student and teacher level, ECEP and other national-level organizations have demonstrated the importance of focusing on change at the state level, as this can have important, long-term implications on policy and infrastructure. This poster describes ECEP’s emergent design as a backbone organization helping state-level teams achieve educational change around CS. It also highlights key lessons learned through the alliance about how to foster CS education change at the state level. Four key lessons stand out. 1) The importance of understanding that engaging states requires appreciating the commonality of a framework around key areas to change (such as state standards, teacher certification and graduation requirements) but also respecting the uniqueness of state circumstances in these change areas. 2) The shared value created through a collective impact model to build a community that can support rich discussion and sharing of ideas. 3) The utility of an empirically derived a 4-stage model of state change used by ECEP that emphasized defining leaders, understanding the CS education landscape and finding allies to support efforts. and 4) The role of state team structures that can facilitate change when they are guided by identifying and engaging key stakeholders within a state and giving them a voice in driving the strategies and plans.
v
Sounds like politics
🤨 1
d
Yeah, this touches all levels of social, cultural, educational, and business level concerns. I think it's fair to say that there's some flavor of politics in there somewhere
The Humane Tech community is an organization built specifically to deal with those things (e.g. what non-technical things need to change): https://community.humanetech.com It's still on my to-do to investigate them further
💡 1