There are some efforts in the physical world to de...
# thinking-together
a
There are some efforts in the physical world to de-siloize products/artefacts that might be worthwhile as an analogue https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/2012/12/how-to-make-everything-ourselves-open-modular-hardware.html. The progressive levels of user involvement is probably relevant to many UXs. (take out "solar" from the URL if you want to go to the conventional, non-solar-powered version of the website)
❤️ 8
b
I’ve felt a few times that it’d be lovely if general stuff that isn’t especially designed for modularity, or even for reuse, nonetheless, tried to kind of fit in to a system of interoperable norms. So, it could just be not making something with a dimension of 100.5 mm, because that won’t quite fit in lots of places – instead go a little under. But it might also be adding some mounting holes or studs on to something at a standard spacing. It would just be a kind of expectation to try to engineer in more opportunities for things work together.
👍 1
Apropos, it turns out that both a square grid and also a hexagonal grid allow many more rotations than “the obvious” ones. For a finite square grid possible rotations are given by the Pythagorean triples. On a hex grid it’s a similar story – https://math.stackexchange.com/a/3295552/120105
🍰 2