<https://tashian.com/articles/dynamicland/>
# thinking-together
i
c
Thanks Ivan for sharing! I learned so much from writing this over the past year—including from conversations with people here in the FoC community. ❤️
i
I just finished reading it. This was a wonderful article, giving a perspective into Dynamicland and the people behind it that I've been missing. Some people (here and elsewhere) are critical of what they see as hero worship of Victor, but I think they're missing out. Reading about this helps me to know the meaningful story behind the work and people I admire and respect, so that I can better understand and format my own research process. Thank you for making the effort to investigate and write this, and I'm glad you're here in this community.
❤️ 2
c
Thanks Ivan!
e
I visited Dynamicland. It imagines a future where humans and computers are more intertwined. In that sense it is like the original Negroponte Architecture Machine, which produced a prototype of Google Street view in 1970 when everyone was still on punchcards and terminals. Unfortunately with today's technology the interaction model that users are offered is incredibly clumsy. The colored dots on their sheets of paper are basically a bar code, and not a well designed one at that, referring to code stored on a server. I think they would prefer to have MS' AR goggles, but that would take 100x the programming and at least 20x the budget. The realities of current programming make it effectively a lonely outpost in man-machine evolution.
🤔 1
w
There is a clunkiness to it. It took me a little while understand and appreciate the attempt to jump so far from present-day conventions so as to avoid being sucked back into local optima.
c
@carl Thank you Carl for writing this! So many good details that are easily overlooked.
❤️ 1
"As a result, most professional programmers today spend their days editing text files inside an 80-column-wide command line interface first designed in the mid-1960s. And most people don’t even question it. But there is a subculture of programmers — with Victor as its natural center — who believe that programming is in a Dark Age because of this near-universal commitment to the trinity."
"They could follow intuitive hunches that were unlikely to lead to anything. They could spend long, quiet days reading and doing uninterrupted deep work in a direction of their choosing" <== this should be a human right, to really think, to engage in sensemaking you really DO need quiet days and uniterrupted work...
even more interestign this story!
I have started to look at a series which is called awakening from the meaning crisis:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54l8_ewcOlY

Its really interesting to see how these things blend and interact with each other. I would argue that every programmer aka human beeing things about this:
how is my work meaningful to me and in relationship with society
For example dijkstra hints at this when speaking about the relationship between computer industry and computing science
we shape technology and technology shapes us in return
I think its a good thing to approach this from a multi diverse perspective, alan kay mentions this sometimes too when he tells stories from the beginning of the field of computing, that because there was no field prior to that, people from different fields came to it to contribute ( biology, math, physics but also psychology)
For example, If you read up on Seymour Papert you can really see how important the influence of Psychology was on his work
Some more gems from the dynamicland article:
In a talk he gave last year at Harvard, Victor laid out three major design principles from the research that were incorporated into Realtalk:
1. The medium should be communal and accessible. People should learn and collaborate through awareness, with no assumption of a single, isolated user sitting at a laptop with a keyboard and mouse. (the humane medium , I love it!)
2. The medium should allow people to think with their bodies, because we are more than fingers and hands. (cognitive science!)
3. The medium should expand people’s agency and liberate their creativity; rather than being an app with a limited set of features defined by a corporation and imposed on people (agency and creativity - what is the relationship with corporations)
g
Great article. I really like the end piece about infinity minus x. My own take on this for years has been "science can barely imagine what is".
👏 1