I see a tension between "quarter-by-quarter financ...
# thinking-together
m
I see a tension between "quarter-by-quarter financials" and "research protected from that"
s
Yeah I kind of feel like the “quarter-by-quarter financials” vs “research protected from that” is a cop out
Or maybe my point in a less confrontational way way is that I don’t see why that tension is inherent in research vs the business
In an alternate history, Xerox could have productized the research that was going on at PARC instead of Jobs/Apple
m
it seems that people that are good at one are not good at the other and they don't seem to like collaborating for both sides' benefit 🙂
and there seems to be in-between people that are not the best at any of the sides but at least they can bridge the divide, often accused of misinterpreting or stealing from research
s
Its kind of funny that Xerox PARC is one of the main subjects here
since the history of Xerography is exactly that 🙂
💯 1
Chester Carlson researched and invented electrophotography/Xerography, then spent almost 20 years trying to get it to market
k
To elaborate on the two sides: there's a time when a project needs a couple of years alone with its creator (as @Michael Dubakov said), and that works best in a large company managing a portfolio of products (like Xerox). But there comes a time when a project needs execution, and that works best in a company that's all-in on it, providing a sense of urgency and consequence. So it's not so much that people are good at one or the other, it seems to me. It's the company culture that sets the environment to encourage one phase or another.
❤️ 2
i
@Scott Werner And of course, there's the colloquial meaning of xerox as a "cheap copy" — which the Mac is of PARC's work, and Windows was of the Mac.
s
🙂
cheap copies can fund a lot of research