/poll "The safety vs risk of my project is..." "sa...
# thinking-together
d
/poll "The safety vs risk of my project is..." "safe and incremental" "building on existing with radical elements" "ground up risky and radical"
l
What would be an example of something risky/radical?
d
Good question, and presumably I can't use my own project as an example, so I'd say something like BitTorrent? BitCoin? Visicalc?
Let me go away and think of others..
There was a time when everything was risky and radical, even FORTRAN!
LISP
COBOL
Xerox Parc stuff
DynamicLand
s
I think of radical in terms of how many things - tools or ideas - you can't reuse. So Darklang is radical. Onex is radical (Duncan can't use his project, but I can šŸ˜„). @Kartik Agaram’s Mu is radical. The more radical something is, the harder it is also to explain in terms of prevalent terminology because it may not fit into the existing categories. "A new programming language" - easy to understand. "A new database" - ditto. "A new network protocol", "a new os" - ok cool. Which of these is Darklang, or Onex, or Mu?
šŸ‘ 2
d
Yeah, Onex is OS, language, database and protocol. And new UI. 🤪
All built on C and syscalls or embedded chip hardware directly
s
From the website: "Onex is a mobile app" - ah, got it. šŸ˜„
d
Oh yeah. That too.
l
radicality: ratio of new and existing tools/concepts // high radicality -> often harder to "explain in terms of prevalent terminology"
level of risk: proportional to radicality?
k
Heh, @shalabh, I clicked "building on existing" before I opened this thread šŸ˜„ But your list of questions is thought-provoking.