any TLA+ interested people here? (<http://lamport....
# thinking-together
m
any TLA+ interested people here? (http://lamport.azurewebsites.net/tla/tla.html)
3
s
I bought the Practical TLA+ book but then started reading the Alloy book online 😄
m
Just finished readling Practical TLA+, went to read "Specifying Systems" by Lamport and noticead I had already read it in the past 😛 (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/specifying-systems-the-tla-language-and-tools-for-hardware-and-software-engineers/)
@Stathis this alloy book? http://softwareabstractions.org/
s
correct
Sorry I said I started reading it online, I meant I got an e-book
o
I find TLA+ very interesting but never practiced it. Just read a bit about it and the concepts.
m
same here, I would like to be able to use it, but like with lisp and erlang, even learning about it changes the way I see programming and helps me with designs.
1
s
I find it pretty interesting, even though I'm generally not into the static typed super verified languages. TLA+ has kind of a minimalism that is quite appealing. Also yay, state machine models! I wish it was built-in to systems so we could verify certain properties in-place.
👍 2
s
@shalabh I’ve never tried it, but there’s this: https://github.com/Viasat/salt
👀 1