This week on code faster, 2 good and one weird. Go...
# thinking-together
t
This week on code faster, 2 good and one weird. Good #1 pullrequest, a company I occasionally review code for on a part time basis synidcated one of my posts! Good #2, Gradient Ventures (Google's VC arm) retweeted their syndication! Weird: I tried writing a more captivating title, "jq features considered harmful", but it didn't feel right after launch. I tried a few more and eventually felt happy with "Avoid these 6 jq features". Still looking for good resources on how to write a good title if anybody has suggestions
👍 1
i
You should add a link to your post!
5
t
@Tyler Adams title 1 sounds like a title from pre 2018, and title 2 sounds like a title from post 2018 (for better or worse) 😛 it's interesting that kind of phrasing totally developed out of clickbait marketing but seeing it in increasingly reputable news services now too...
t
Of course, https://codefaster.substack.com/p/jq-features-considered-harmful . Yeah, a good title seems to matter almost more than a good article these days...