<https://twitter.com/conaw/status/1283434727584620...
# thinking-togetherc
curious_reader
08/12/2020, 4:42 PMc
Chris G
08/12/2020, 5:01 PMDon't need to invert it if we get the right computer - for instance, the right computer for a human may be that the whole desk is a display, and that there are physical props as interface elements
s
Steve
08/12/2020, 5:05 PMYea… I tend to think this narrative is narrow minded too. On one side: I would love to see more “_real-world_” interactive design, but on the other, I want the computer to just do shit for me without having a bunch of paper on my desk. Nonetheless, IMO the computer gets in our way most the time and in the future we will have something like Jarvis in Ironman (which I hope Dynamicland is ultimately heading towards). All I want is: “Computer, do my taxes” and “Computer, earl grey hot.”
Steve
08/12/2020, 5:06 PMAlso… you cannot carry around physical props on the go… I could see the phones being embedded into the arm, but no way will you catch me with a pocket full of neatly wrapped paper and a tripod on my back for the camera to watch my paper move.
Steve
08/12/2020, 5:07 PMMobile is the future. To me, mobile is not a phone it’s computers getting out of the way and more assisting my life and working with me so that I can be more mobile 😉
💯 1
❤️ 3
c
Chris G
08/12/2020, 5:12 PMJarvis was neat because the idea wasn't "computer go do this for me", it was "let's work on this together"
🙏 1
💯 7
s
Steve
08/12/2020, 5:14 PM💯 I’m crying with love for that statement.
Steve
08/12/2020, 5:29 PMhttps://twitter.com/iopeak/status/1293599679108640770 just to be public about it 😉
j
Jack Rusher
08/13/2020, 12:38 PMA CS professor thirty years ago: 'In the future when we talk about computers people will ask, "you mean those little things we put under our tongues to make us smarter?"'
🤣 3
💯 2
2 Views