fp hot take <https://twitter.com/dalt_nb/status/14...
# of-functional-programming
d
o
It’s fun pulling these things apart. Mutation vs mutator vs mutability vs state vs value, etc. Feels like it would be a fun game at the pub, but I might just have a weird idea of fun!
šŸŗ 1
My hunch is that your hot take doesn't hold true in all cases but I can't come up with a counter-example atm ĀÆ\_(惄)_/ĀÆ
h
@daltonb would you point to a some context that would make the quote meaningful?
šŸ‘ 1
d
@hvrosen happy to. since meaning is made in the mind, can you give some context on how you've processed the phrase so far?
y
I’m also too lost to project meaning to this quote. Perhaps an example of someone that isn’t the mutator but the state or vice versa could help us
h
@yairchu @daltonb After due consideration, I think it is just a witty reformulation of the classic ā€œif you’re not paying for the product, you are the productā€. In that case, sorry for not getting the joke šŸ™‚ ! I did look up ā€œhot takeā€; ā€œAn opinion based on simplistic moralizing rather than actual thought.ā€œ.. And yeah, I can absolutely see how even mentioning state/mutation in a FP context would equal moralizing šŸ™‚ Now, being serious, I absolutely do consider fundamental concepts such as state and value essential in any language design, at the most fundamental level, but that shouldn’t detract from a good joke, so let’s enjoy the deep discussion topic at a later time, beer in hand or not šŸ™‚ !
šŸ‘ 1
y
So is it a way of saying that there’s still mutation going on under the hood? Yeah we already knew that.