Hey FoC :wave: I recently stumbled upon this: <h...
# thinking-together
c
Hey FoC 👋 I recently stumbled upon this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qp9jI6L2Tsg

https://github.com/muni-town/roomy I found it quite interesting to see how fluid you could go from thought/chat to blog/text (see attachment). Different projects related to AT Protocol are exploring different notions of communication patterns like here: https://cosmik.network/ or here https://garden.co/. Cosmik employes the concept of stigmercy, something which I think would be very useful for FoC and other communities. Foc beeing trapped in SLACK for so long is cruel enough. Of course tools were build but ... One can really see how certain preconceived notions of interaction patterns are starting to break up in interesting ways. a PKM tool is usually for personal reflection( hence the P in PKM) of course I could always take a zettel and expand it or include it in messages, which I still sometimes do. But I think there more to it. As we explorer the patterns of communication. Relating to other people, where does my - self, myself start where does -the others- start? So chat is quite a low entry barrier and a interesting start to start communicating with others. Their project site even has a values section: https://muni.town/values I recently started using anytype.io and was surprised how good the mobile sync worked. Sharing with other people works OK. But then I tried to share a SVG file,... or I tried to create mermaid or a mindmap and view it on mobile... Clojure clerk is a notebook for some computational stuff but I like the Idea of having snippets that can be evaluated which reminded me of projects like: http://cloxp.github.io/cloxp-intro.html or https://lively-kernel.org/ To hit the sweet spot is really not simple one wants to avoid to re-invent all of personal computing just to do some note taking and collaboration... While researching I also found this: https://neurite.network/ I vaguely remember reading something about it here at Foc but the search did bring up anything for me.. I hope that the AT protocol related tools become mature enough such that I can use it for my own zettelkasten which is based on markdown. But I really would like to test out the other collaboration based features. What are your experiences with zettelkasten and collaboration? Could you imagine something like roomy being sufficiently good enough to finally replace SLACK for example? WDYT @Ivan Reese?
k
Thanks for these links. I'm default skeptical of new things, particularly new things that look like startups, or hide behind a waitlist, or don't work on Firefox. However, Erlend has karma with me, and I had missed this talk. I just created an account on roomy.chat if anyone wants to try it out. Does this link work for others? It's possible it requires us to bind our own domain name..
i
one wants to avoid to re-invent all of personal computing just to do some note taking and collaboration
It doesn't hurt to start with writing and expand from there :)
As for my current thoughts on replacing Slack: we're spoiled for choice, in a bad way. There are so many different ways to approach this, all with tradeoffs that I personally don't have time to evaluate (for now). So the very first problem to be solved is social: who is available to work on this problem, and when? Also, choosing something like AT Proto or ActivityPub or Gemini or similar alternative/variant is downstream of design questions like "what are our cultural values?" and "how do we want to be empowered?". So yours is a fine question, I'm just ill-positioned to answer it right now. <3
k
We do have confirmation that people are able to use my link above to kick the wheels on roomy.chat. I'm going to try to keep it going. I've called it Freeing our Computers, as a compromise between FoC and Freewheeling Apps. It has a plausible affordance for going from chat to threads to pages with links that are accessible outside the community, and I'd love to test with others how well it works over time.
i
I had to authorize roomy.chat with my bsky account first, then click the link here a second time to add the room
k
Interesting!
One thing to be aware of: it's still alpha software. I gather the server goes down and periodically gets reset. https://blog.muni.town/roomy-chat-alpha-2
s
I had the same experience as Ivan
Huh, It got added to the sidebar twice for me, and clicking on either of them deadlocks the app until I go back and click on your invite link again
k
On one of my devices I'm no longer able to see the channel and category I created. So definitely half-baked.
c
FYI: it’s all totally pre alpha , BUT we could play around with it …
k
Do y'all still see the channel I created?
s
image.png
no, but I see a picture for the icon(s) now
dont see any channels actually
replies look nicer suddenly 🤷‍♀️
@curious_reader yea totally, I do think the 'every member keeps a copy of the data' model is the right way, and I like that they seem to be doing P2P in a workable way
dont quite get the vision of what 'digital gardening' means yet
k
Oh you can see the stuff on the main pane even if the channel list is missing. I can't see either.
s
only via the invite link, if i click on the icon to the left im locked out
the two buttons on the left pane, and the two buttons top center seem to work tho
ok, seems to be that there's a built in wiki, and you can retroactively make things threads
kinda zulip style? havent used that app much
c
@Spencer Fleming check this out for gardening, IMO it’s what we have been doing here for years, they just found a nice label for it :), in my Zettelkasten I call it “Begriffsgenese“ https://blog.muni.town/chatty-community-gardens/
s
ok, if I understand it right, it's about going up the formality from Chat -> Thread -> Wiki Page / Article, in as seamless a way as possible
zulip does a similar-ish thing. Every chat has to be started with a Topic
or can be pulled out retroactively if someone notices things have diverged
and those stick around, so it becomes kinda equivalent to a forum with a general category + the topic is the title of the post
k
Zulip seems to have chat + threads, but no equivalent to wiki pages.
s
i dont think it has a wiki feature tho, yea
it is a kinda neat way of trying to get both chat & forums in the same place
i dont totally know how I feel abt it yet though
only use it to keep up with sandstorm.org and i havent quite learned to use it properly so far
digital gardening seems not so totally far off an idea from the wikipedia talk page tbh: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ranavalona_I
which is a good sign
c
Community - wisdom and vision gardening

https://youtu.be/v5dBRmjF8mc