Still all ugly as sin, of course. :slightly_smilin...
# devlog-together
j
Still all ugly as sin, of course. 🙂 But I now have a usable platform for demonstrating explainable, declarative encodings of legislation, with hypothetical and reverse reasoning, etc.
i
Interesting! How do you get "jane threw scissors" by abduction? How do we know jane didn't throw paper?
Ah — I see what I missed. Jane throws scissors just in Answer #1. Presumably, Answer #2 is jane throwing paper (jane wins), and Answer #3 is jane throwing rock (tie)?
j
Close! 🙂
Answer 1 is bob wins. Only one possibility, Jane threw scissors. Answer 2 is jane wins. Three possibilities, there: jane beats jane with each of the three signs. (The rule is poorly encoded, because it doesn't require a disunity between the players.)